Warmup time over the NEDC & FTP-75 drive cycles
I'm putting together a simulation of the energy budget for a car driving
the NEDC and FTP-75 emission drive cycles. I need to incorporate the
effect of warmup enrichment for gasoline and diesel powertrains.
As a first approximation, I plan to simulate a simple heat capacity model of the engine thermal mass.
Can
anyone help with data or references regarding how long (in seconds) a
typical powertrain takes to warm up from cold to operating temperature
on the two drive cycles?
Aside from the enormous scaling differences between the powertrain
between a smart and a Ferrari that preclude "typical" from being of any
use whatsoever ... diesels don't do warm-up enrichment. They'll use a
little more after a cold start because of greater heat losses, more
friction, glow plugs are often left on for a period of time after the
engine starts which increases electrical demand, etc/gate valve., but by no means
are they running "rich".
And, modern gasoline engines with good
fuel injection also have minimum enrichment. It might be a smidge rich
for the first couple of revolutions to make sure the engine starts, and
it won't be able to run in closed-loop until the oxygen sensor starts
giving a signal (and those are electrically heated and often very close
to the engine, so this takes seconds nowadays), but given that the HC
and CO emissions during cold start "count", they lean out ASAP after
startup. Modern fuel injection minimizes (almost eliminates) "puddling"
that necessitated enrichment in the old carbureted days. Modern fuel
injection is capable of taking an extremely accurate "guess" at the
required fuel volume even in the absence of the oxygen sensor signal.
They'll use more fuel for the first little bit for all the same reasons
that diesels do (above) with the exception of the glow-plug heating bit.
Most modern diesels don't have "glow plugs" anymore. And they typically
adjust timing rather than fueling to make up for cold conditions, except
for maybe a very transient early period. As stated above, most systems
cannot afford to run an extensive cold cycle and still meet emissions,
so they will try to line out to nominal conditions early.
Also,
extreme cold conditions may not be emission controlled (less likely) or
may have another emissions tier (more likely), so results may vary if
the temperature is cold enough. What is cold enough depends on the
regulations, engine size and application, and negotiations with EPA (or
appropriate regulatory body), so there is no specific number to throw
out there where you might see the change.
MORE NEWS